Bush legacy BS

I like how people trying to defend Bush’s record, including W himself, like to emphasize how no 9/11 size attack has happened since 9/11 and that was his administration’s priority, and since none has occurred therefore he was successfull at his main objective.  The one thing that he did not royally fuckup was something that didn’t happen. He was also incredibly effective at protecting America from an meteor collision, since that also didn’t happen. And Mt. St. Helens has not blown up in the last eight years. Way to go! A 9/11 size attack most certainly DID happen while he was the president. One just hasn’t happened *lately*, so his record was a success. Bush’s record was a success because it hasn’t killed me yet. Wonderful!

Whatever dude. I’m done with you.

2 Comments

  • I spied a tabloid headline the other day while I was waiting to buy something at the drugstore, which said something like “drunk Bush goes berserk!” Then Michele told me she saw part of his last news conference and he was hanging all over the podium with this really weird slouchy body language. Is it possible his handlers have stopped taking the bottle away from him, now that they realize it doesn’t matter any more?

  • arcturus wrote:

    And he completely absolves himself from 9/11, since it was the first terrorist attack on the homeland and “no one could’ve ever imagined it.” Uh, 9/11 was the first attack as long as you don’t count the 1993 terrorist attack on the (…wait for it…) World Trade Center in NYC.

    I hope he takes a trip abroad and gets arrested for war crimes by some other country.

Leave a Reply

Your email is never shared.Required fields are marked *